The buck stops at and up the WSJs cloaca

This screenshot was arrived at after taking an option to look at the Wall Street journal’s article as depicted in the screenshot as accessed on Google News
I don’t know why I bothered but I guess I thought that I would be able to read this article online but the second screenshot tells me that they want me to subscribe and they give me membership options which is kind of nice but I don’t want to be a member of anything certainly not a newspaper that has a political bias, which is basically every newspaper out there. Or I have a great opportunity to give them a dollar for their opinion. I don’t want their opinion. I want unbiased facts. Unbiased facts I would pay for that’d be real cool but you can’t buy unbiased facts. All you can buy is doodoo, in the flavor that you want. Now I have nothing against the Wall Street Journal. Just as I have nothing against the New York Times. But if I’m going to pay the Wall Street Journal for their opinion, I’m also almost obligated to myself to pay the New York Times for their opinion so I can take the two of them and then somewhere in the middle perhaps figure out what the hell is going on. But I already know what the hell is going on. Not a damn thing is going on these people are stalling they’re scared and they’re old. They’re going to live many many more years and very happily I hope and healthy to boot and then they will die and hopefully they will no longer be in office after they do so but then there’s going to be no one who knows what the hell to do next and we’re going to hopefully have two new political parties because everybody on both sides of the aisle in Congress is ancient Antiquated scary fossilized monsters … Congress is a RICO operation and all they do is take a dollar from us and then give us a back about $0.14 or something ridiculous like that I could be exaggerating but I don’t know because they’re never going to tell us the truth.

My question to the Wall Street Journal is why do you say continue reading your article but it’s not my article you want me to give you $1 to make it my article it’s your article and you say right out front that it’s your opinion I don’t need your opinion I have my own opinion and I can do with my opinion the same as you can do with your opinion but tell you what Wall Street Journal, I want you to do it first. I won’t even charge you a dollar for me to give you my opinion. You want your article just as I supposedly have my article for you. My article for you is shove it. You can take the dollar that you would give me for my opinion and insert it in your cloaca. And if you don’t know what a cloaca is you can borrow the dollar that you would have paid me from a loan shark and all go pee together while you figure this out.

Give me a dollar my ass. Why don’t I just give you my friggin lunch money?

One Reply to “The buck stops at and up the WSJs cloaca”

  1. I must show appreciation to this writer just for bailing me out of this type of setting. Right after surfing throughout the world wide web and obtaining concepts that were not productive, I was thinking my entire life was over. Living without the presence of strategies to the difficulties you have fixed by means of your entire post is a crucial case, and ones which could have badly damaged my entire career if I hadn’t discovered the blog. Your personal ability and kindness in dealing with a lot of things was tremendous. I’m not sure what I would’ve done if I had not come upon such a stuff like this. I am able to now look ahead to my future. Thank you so much for the high quality and sensible guide. I won’t think twice to endorse your blog to anybody who would need recommendations about this situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

PHP Code Snippets Powered By :